PDA

View Full Version : POLL : [img] on the sigs

sintax
29th April 2002, 18:39
yay or nay
sintax
29th April 2002, 18:46
Sig is the little piccie bit u can put in the Signature bit to show your 3l337 skillz in a graphical form =)
Guv
29th April 2002, 18:49
i vote "yay"
MrOnion
29th April 2002, 19:38
nooo dont vote yes.

If u do there will only be pages of sigs and no substance to the discussions.......
Oh wait theres no sensibles discussions now...

images in sigs it is then :P

Onion
KermitTheFrag
29th April 2002, 21:37
Err a big NO!!!!!!!!!

I dont want to download a pile of CRAP attached to every post thanks. It lags my damn ADSL ffs!!!
sintax
29th April 2002, 21:50
oh come on!!!! graphical sigs are good, its encourages design =)
im on a 56K, and i apperciate it! so dont complain bout ADSL fraggy :)
Ross
29th April 2002, 21:51
noooo think of us poor 56kers!! :(
sintax
29th April 2002, 21:52
(its all a cheap ploy so i can use my sig)
=)
http://www.geocities.com/soggy_moon_pie/signaturerar.jpg
KermitTheFrag
29th April 2002, 21:55
Originally posted by sintax
oh come on!!!! graphical sigs are good, its encourages design =)
im on a 56K, and i apperciate it! so dont complain bout ADSL fraggy :)

Err why. the web is an information medium, not show off medium.

I browse without javascript, flash etc. I get the CONTENT not the NOISE.
sintax
29th April 2002, 21:58
well arnt you mr. clued up :p

a bit of visual entertainmnet is all im asking :p
KermitTheFrag
29th April 2002, 21:59
Originally posted by sintax
well arnt you mr. clued up :p

a bit of visual entertainmnet is all im asking :p

http://www.joecartoon.com/ <-- there are sites dedicated to visual entertainment :)
sintax
29th April 2002, 22:00
ta :D
Dizzie
29th April 2002, 22:02
Images on sigs just mean that you have to wait longer to get what you want. No one likes to wait for things. I'm also on a 56k modem, so I voted NO!
Bowser
29th April 2002, 22:26
A big NO NO NO from me.
Sigs to me seem taccy and americanised. Why does anyone want a sh*t massive pic on the bottom of every post they put up on the forums. Theres just no point.
ant
29th April 2002, 22:28
yeah and make pacges even ****ing slower to load, go get a life and find something better to do
sintax
29th April 2002, 22:42
Originally posted by ant
yeah and make pacges even ****ing slower to load, go get a life and find something better to do

what u mean like posting on here? its a harmless poll, ure entiltled to a vote and your opinion but dont start getting personal - your obviously just a prick, i just remembered why i dont post on these boards much.
SquireMuldoon
29th April 2002, 22:47
A big and definite NO!

Some visual sigs are good, but the other 99.9% are utter ****e, crimes against aesthetics and graphic design and more often than not, altogether too large.

Listen to the Muldoon. He is right.
Learn these words and prosper. :p:
Guigsy
29th April 2002, 23:30
maybe if you have to earn to right :p
piddle spank
30th April 2002, 00:12
i not sure if its posable but cant you make two modes one with img in sigs and one not (like the colour schemes in themain site). i doubt its possable but it would solve this me thinks
Zenith
30th April 2002, 00:43
I vote absolutely NO!

Take a look at the TribalWar forums (http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?forumid=1) for an example of what happens when [IMG] tags are enabled in sigs.
Guigsy
30th April 2002, 00:47
or the madoinion forums. god