does anyone else think this is true?

[MySeN]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=9%2F11

This is basicly saying that the american govenment blew up the twin towers.
do you think this is possible?

[TimmyNoShoes]

Its possible, but i have better things to do other than worry about what a bunch of stupid yanks do or dont.

[KingDaveRa]

It's always been on the conspiracy cards. I think it's possible that it was meant to be a strike, but not collapse.

Whatever happened, it was still a tragedy.

[Mastacheif]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=9%2F11

This is basicly saying that the american govenment blew up the twin towers.
do you think this is possible?
Run with your curosity an keep digging you will find more than enough evidence to prove the U.S govt involvement in ensureing these attacks happened yes. It become a case of how far the rabbit hole goes and beleive me it gets scary.



But be carefull, as one person has allready said "why bother with what a bunch of yanks do"

[TheDon]

You wont find any evidence to "prove" that they did it. Proof and suspicion are two different things.

[Demonic]

However, none of it is actually "evidence" as such.

Whether its due to a cover up, or due to conspiracy theorists turning into hoaxers (or just plain seeing things that arent there), who knows. And as KDR says, it doesnt matter who did it, it was a trajedy.

[Zenith]

I've not seen the video, but I've always been dubious that slamming a plane into a skyscraper could eventually lead it to it falling down like a house of cards.

Aviation fuel Jet A-1 burns at about 980°C at the hottest.
(source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel )

Structural steel melts at 1370°C at the coolest.
(source: http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.html )

Even if the steel were softened and already bent from the force of the explosions, it wouldn't melt. I'm not saying that the conspiracy theorists are right. I am saying that there is more to the buildings coming down than first appearances.

[Swyft]

right, enough of this ****e.

http://wtc.nist.gov/reports_october05.htm

have a read, and THEN come back with your bloody conspiracy theories.

[Limi]

The Pentagon "attack" is what stirred it the most now

[Semajal]

I've not seen the video, but I've always been dubious that slamming a plane into a skyscraper could eventually lead it to it falling down like a house of cards.

Aviation fuel Jet A-1 burns at about 980°C at the hottest.
(source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel )

Structural steel melts at 1370°C at the coolest.
(source: http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.html )

Even if the steel were softened and already bent from the force of the explosions, it wouldn't melt. I'm not saying that the conspiracy theorists are right. I am saying that there is more to the buildings coming down than first appearances.


They worked that out that the aviation fuel didnt damage the steel, the impact of the jet hitting removed the fire cladding and the aviation fuel started fires within the building which reached the temperatures needed to severly weaken supports. Once it started falling it was going to continue due to the momentum. And yeah that link posted will explain away most of it. The US gov. tends to encourage these things by covering up and coming out with alot of crap.

[Cypher]

Around the time, something I was watching about it, from an architect in the US, said that the WTCs were designed to withstand winds many times stronger than the force of a plane crash, and that the building was designed so that even with extreme heats from a fire, only individual floors would be damaged.
In the same report, another architect said that it's probable that the support-column of the building was rushed, and the steel reinforcements in the concrete may've expanded at differnt speeds, breaking the concrete

Imo... It's either been planned in incredible detail by someone 'higher up' than the hiijackers (someone with uptodate knowledge of the US military), or pure fluke that they decided to crash into it... On the day that the US airforce using all but 2 of their aircraft on the other side of the country (and took all the ammo with them...), a week after the WTC owner had over-insured the buildings, etc

Plus the FBI recently mentioned that they've actually got no proof that Bin-Laden was ever involved

But constant conspiracies arnt helping either, with people coming up with things and passing their ideas around, surely its becoming a big game of chinese-whispers :\