PDA

View Full Version : lol ownd


kd123
7th May 2006, 16:25
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/


I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: It remains to be seen if multiplay will reduce us to acute penury in the blink of an eye. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that it is out of control, like a runaway freight train. One could truthfully say that this makes the issue an even greater tragedy. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that just the other day, some of its belligerent lackeys forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described multiplay's blueprint for a world in which imperious gauleiters are free to give cankered loan sharks far more credibility than they deserve. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket, I reflected upon the way that I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to take a strong position on multiplay's quips, which, after all, defy the law of the land. Of course, the tone of its protests is eerily reminiscent of that of mumpish, churlish dopeheads of the late 1940s, in the sense that its publicity stunts are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of emotionalism. Take, for example, the worst kinds of noxious weasels I've ever seen. Now look at multiplay. If you don't believe there's a similarity, then consider that its lamentations were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, multiplay's "compromises" are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, I want to keep the faith. That may seem simple enough, but there's an important difference between me and multiplay. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Multiplay, in contrast, is willing to kill for its -- or, if not to kill, at least to destroy our culture, our institutions, and our way of life.

Forgive me for boring you with all the gory details, but the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to protect our peace, privacy, and safety? In multiplay's line of business, you don't need to know what you're talking about. To a lesser degree and on a smaller scale, if you were to tell multiplay that it is unable to support its assertions with documentation of any sort, it'd just pull its security blanket a little tighter around itself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. Since I have promised to be candid, I will tell you candidly that if multiplay truly believes that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet, then maybe it should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

Whereas multiplay claims that it is entitled to form the association in the public's mind between any fairy tales it disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality, I, for one, claim that it is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! If one could get a Ph.D. in Unilateralism, multiplay would be the first in line to have one. We must embrace diversity. We must call a spade a spade. And we must shield people from multiplay's gruesome and smarmy deceptions. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo.

kandy
7th May 2006, 16:58
My complaint about Wizzo

If ever I had a tough letter to write, this is it. My challenge is to convince you that this phenomenon seems commonplace in our disintegrating society. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. Wizzo has an ego of galactic proportions. With this central point cleared up, the rest of his arguments are rendered moot, as this is not the first time I've wanted to make some changes here. But it is the first time I realized that I recently informed him that his sympathizers clear-cut ancient forest lands. Wizzo said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, he insists that he has the trappings of deity. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject.

Wizzo's emotionally biased and expletive-filled hypnopompic insights push home the point that he has never been able to assimilate and accept the humane ideals, civilized aims, and social aspirations of his peers. I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that Wizzo seems to assume that he is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. This is an assumption of the worst kind because he must sense his own irremediable inferiority. That's why Wizzo is so desperate to deprive people of dignity and autonomy; it's the only way for him to distinguish himself from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if Wizzo also realized that I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, wily world run by poxy scrubs. As a practical matter, the poisonous wine of recidivism had been distilled long before Wizzo entered the scene. Wizzo is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. He has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that society is supposed to be lenient towards crapulous, slovenly know-nothings. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so."

I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that if Wizzo could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to represent heaven as hell and, conversely, the most wretched life as paradise. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that Wizzo's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, his criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Wizzo's "I think … I believe … I feel" game. Wizzo is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside himself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of his wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. If we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward feudalism. A final word: I cannot conceive of any circumstance under which Wizzo's expostulations could be considered appropriate.

Why do you have a complaint about me on your Web page?

Freelance
7th May 2006, 17:46
http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/newsitelogo.jpg (http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/)
seriously, you're going to get more people reading your post properly and taking notice of it if you make it plain and easy to read.

TimmyNoShoes
7th May 2006, 18:03
I dont understand why people think using complex words makes them appear smarter, surely the easier your writing is to understand by everyone who reads it, yet still conveys everything they need it to, the smarter they are.
:confused:

Baz
7th May 2006, 18:25
click the link at the top tards :p:

TimmyNoShoes
7th May 2006, 18:37
Originally posted by Baz
click the link at the top tards :p:

Yeah i know it was a generic thing, my rant was more aimed at the type of people who write that stuff.

kd123
7th May 2006, 19:53
Originally posted by TimmyNoShoes
Yeah i know it was a generic thing, my rant was more aimed at the type of people who write that stuff.

it's a joke u moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooron

anyway for what reason would a troglodyte such as yourself object to my frequent use of the divine milleu that is the subjunctive? prolifigate use of esoteric pronunciation is a right.

no friends
7th May 2006, 20:04
would like to take a moment to champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of Mr. Face Lollerskates. It is worth noting at the outset that Mr. Face Lollerskates has planted his vicegerents everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Lollerskates's ability to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot but it also provides irrefutable evidence that I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset Lollerskates. Here's what I have to say to them: Lollerskates somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that he considers sullen or fork-tongued. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. Flighty nobodies are sharply focused on an immediate goal: to wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction. According to the laws of probability, Lollerskates should think about how his smear tactics lead unsavory, warped bloodthirsty-types to condone illegal activities. If Lollerskates doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. Sure, he can fabulize about how every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders". That doesn't change the fact that many people are shocked when I tell them that the majority of uncontrollable, obdurate big-labor bosses probably agree that I refuse to dance to his shallow tune. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that he is obviously hiding something. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that if you were to try to tell his apostles that he dances to the tune of diabolic sensationalism, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that if you can go more than a minute without hearing Lollerskates talk about phallocentrism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial.

Lollerskates's loyalists believe that Lollerskates's opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that it's okay if Lollerskates's viewpoints initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend can believe anything, especially if it's false. However headstrong the national picture already is, when Lollerskates hears anyone say that the destructive power of his contrivances is their appeal to the craven, the possession-obsessed, the hideous, and the obtrusive, his answer is to plague our minds. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to upbraid him for being so unpleasant.

There's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will undeniably persist as long as Lollerskates continues to promote group-think attitudes over individual insights. His lickspittles actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these sorts of unimaginative administrators are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world when you least expect it. In reality, of course, Lollerskates is like a parrot that makes noises for attention without any kind of clue as to what it is saying, and everyone with half a brain understands that. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

Shazz
7th May 2006, 20:34
http://www.linuks.mine.nu/stfu-noob.jpg

Langos
8th May 2006, 20:30
^
|| Im with stoopid. :rolleyes:


http://kundweb.netatonce.com/~u21707/images/forum/sucks.jpg

kd123
8th May 2006, 21:49
Aww that kid looks so sad... langos you heartless scumbag how could you mock such an unhappy child?

Freelancer
10th May 2006, 15:37
where are you getting the templates for this stuff??

bvark
10th May 2006, 15:45
From the URL at the top of his post?

Freelancer
10th May 2006, 15:48
i should maybe open my eyes, that would be a good idea :)

kd123
10th May 2006, 20:33
lol i guess you guys would think that last comment was a template. If you think that picture is funny you are sick...
Btw dude did you really believe that was a template or just say that for whatever reason, possibly because i offended your sense of self in some way?

bvark
10th May 2006, 22:52
Originally posted by kd123
lol i guess you guys would think that last comment was a template. If you think that picture is funny you are sick...
Btw dude did you really believe that was a template or just say that for whatever reason, possibly because i offended your sense of self in some way?

What more productive things could you have done with the time it took you to post this reply?

kd123
10th May 2006, 23:23
Originally posted by bvark
What more productive things could you have done with the time it took you to post this reply?

not much seeing as it took me 30 seconds. What more productive things could you have done?

kd123
10th May 2006, 23:27
apart from be an admin possibly lolz

Shazz
11th May 2006, 06:32
Every time you spam somemore god kills a kitten...


http://www.plasticbag.org/images/extra/the_coming_of_the_small_kit.jpg

bvark
11th May 2006, 07:05
Originally posted by kd123
not much seeing as it took me 30 seconds. What more productive things could you have done?

Your mum

kd123
11th May 2006, 09:01
Originally posted by bvark
Your mum

my mum died in a car accident

Langos
12th May 2006, 07:28
Aww that is too bad, I'm sure she would have been proud of the jackass you turned out to be.

JeRkY
12th May 2006, 08:05
stop lowering the tone.... the cs forum is further down the list.