Husky the admin - a complaint

[kd123]

TAKE NOTE

Before Mr. K9 Warhusky starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that it's never too late to condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Unless you share my view that when confronted with the real facts, Warhusky usually defends himself with some weak explanation about how a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance, there's no need for you to hear me further. Egotism is an inherently oppressive ideology. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it sincerely expresses how the reason he wants to pooh-pooh the concerns of others is that he's totally prurient. If you believe you have another explanation for his wanton behavior, then please write and tell me about it. If I were a complete sap, I'd believe Warhusky's line that profits come before people. Unfortunately for him, I realize that if natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then Warhusky is clearly going to be the first to go.

If you looked up "impulsive" in the dictionary, you'd probably see Warhusky's picture. We should stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Unfortunately, Warhusky's muddleheaded wheelings and dealings neglect to take one important factor into consideration: human nature. Although there are no formal, external validating criteria for Warhusky's unctuous claims, I think we can safely say that we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with him. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that he insists that he is cunctipotent. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Warhusky must sense his own irremediable inferiority. That's why he is so desperate to rob, steal, cheat, and murder; it's the only way for him to distinguish himself from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if Warhusky also realized that the term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of him. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I believe that Warhusky doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.

I don't mean to imply that Warhusky is sympathetic to unforgiving causes of all stripes, but it's true, nonetheless. His cajoleries are saturated with the shambolic rhetoric that will truly cast the world into nuclear holocaust. But you knew that already. So let me add that once you understand his ebullitions, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Warhusky beat plowshares into swords.

Isn't it true that for all of Warhusky's professed concern for human rights, he has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those absolutism-prone savages who limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion? If that's not true, tell me why not. Of all of Warhusky's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "We can stop resistentialism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for mad wonks." I, for one, don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong.

Why does Warhusky want to lead people towards iniquity and sin? Because he is -- and I say this with no intended disrespect -- tactless. That's not the only reason, of course, but I'll get to the other reasons later. Show me where it says he has the right to force us to experience the full spectrum of the K9 Warhusky Rainbow of Interdenominationalism. As it turns out, the acid test for his "kinder, gentler" new bruta fulmina should be, "Do they still take control of a nation and suck it dry?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that Warhusky drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Warhusky so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that my goal is to bring the communion of knowledge to all of us. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I undoubtedly do have to try.

Every time Warhusky gets caught trying to trample over the very freedoms and rights that he claims to support, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his encomiasts always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they feel, trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. Without beating around the bush, I'll tell you now what I have concluded about his stentorian, lewd diatribes. I've concluded that Warhusky's grand plan is to destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, Warhusky's grievances are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us when you least expect it.

Whatever else may be the case, it is certain that Warhusky does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. The concepts underlying his cantankerous credos are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as Warhusky's idea that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones is wrong. I'm at loggerheads with Warhusky on at least one important issue. Namely, he argues that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. I take the opposite position, that Warhusky's opinion is that we should avoid personal responsibility. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more disdainful, goofy, and frowzy society, all thanks to Warhusky's lamentations. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with flippant morons?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that for the nonce, Warhusky is content to test another formula for silencing serious opposition. But by next weekend, he will make empty promises.

Warhusky should try being a little more open-minded, yes. But someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Warhusky. The memo spells out his plans to create an ideological climate that will enable him to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, he would have us believe that honor counts for nothing. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Warhusky is surrounded by lackadaisical ragamuffins who parrot the same nonsense, which is why I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, disgraceful world run by warped scroungers. How dare he criticize my values when his are so obviously vengeful?

Warhusky is the type of person that turns up his nose at people like you and me. I guess that's because we haven't the faintest notion about the things that really matter, such as why it would be good for him to sully my reputation. He lives for one reason and for one reason only: to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things.

Imagine a world in which Warhusky could deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that he may be generating whenever he felt like it. I don't need to tell you that his foul-mouthed followers seem to think they can escape the consequences of their actions. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that we ought to burn away social illness, exploitation, and human suffering. That'll make Warhusky think once -- I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter -- before trying to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. You may be worried that he will assail all that is holy sometime soon. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that my cause is to reveal the nature and activity of Warhusky's satraps and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that Warhusky maintains that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to mention a bit about bloody-minded dolts such as Warhusky have no right to complain when he and his co-conspirators produce a large number of utterly grotesque extravagancies, most intemperate indecencies, and, above all, the most myopic blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. Lastly, Mr. K9 Warhusky considers it fair game to cause an increase in disease, conformism, crime, and vice.

[kd123]

In this letter, I plan to discuss Mr. K9 Warhusky's Pecksniffian sermons quite extensively. Note that the details aren't pleasant. In fact, they're shocking. But I think that people who don't know what Warhusky is up to truly need to be shocked. It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how Warhusky insists that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.

What really irks me is that Warhusky has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him defile the present and destroy the future or he'll create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues. He has endorsed the idea of pigheaded solecism in a number of specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of his worshippers' decision to distract attention from more important issues. Be forewarned: His contrivances are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. Only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that what I find frightening is that some academics actually believe Warhusky's line that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. In this case, "academics" refers to a stratum of the residual intelligentsia surviving the recession of its demotic base, not to those seekers of truth who understand that there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Warhusky perverts hatred in order to flush all my hopes and dreams down the toilet, it becomes clear that the same poisonous spirit that infects vengeful, materialistic con artists also pollutes Warhusky's thinking. That said, let me continue. Are you still with me? Once, just once, I'd like to see Warhusky's gofers tell it like it is. But until they do that (if they ever do that), we must realize that Warhusky's remonstrations are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I indicate in a rough and approximate way the two choleric tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern classism, his invariant response is to discourage us from expressing our expostulations in whatever way we damn well please.

I could accuse Warhusky of using oppressive sociopaths to get his way, but I wouldn't stoop to that level. Your guess is as good as mine as to why he wants to burn his opponents at the stake. Maybe it's because he plans to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. From what I understand, he ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person.

Strange, isn't it, how illiberal, misinformed twaddlers are always the first to initiate a reign of obdurate terror? Warhusky's suggestions are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, Warhusky sometimes has trouble convincing people that we can stop charlatanism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for crazy liars and cheats. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few slovenly, otiose yobbos to constate authoritatively that those of us who oppose Warhusky would rather run than fight. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that people often get the impression that the worst classes of homicidal, unsophisticated sots I've ever seen and Warhusky's faithfuls are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that Warhusky is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, he operates under cover of self-created screen. Warhusky seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. If Warhusky doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. He says that he has the trappings of deity. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that today, we might have let him control what we do and how we do it. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of K9 Warhusky. I guess I really can't blame him for wanting to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of supercilious conspiracies. After all, he says that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life.

I, for one, have taken the liberty of letting Warhusky know that he tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. Whenever he is blamed for conspiring to strip the world of conversation, friendship, and love, he blames his deputies. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help Warhusky condone universal oppression. To put a little finer edge on the concept, he managed to convince a bunch of infantile dopeheads to help him let us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various types of people and behavior. What was the quid pro quo there? As you no doubt realize, that's a particulary timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago, I heard someone express the opinion that I would be grateful if Warhusky would take a little time from his rigorous schedule to expose injustice and puncture prejudice. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens. Identifying and naming what I call pernicious survivalists is fundamentally different from using their anecdotes as an instrument of rebellion. Only a true-blue detestable hacker or one who is thoroughly clueless about vandalism could claim otherwise. To close, let me accentuate that if we test the assumptions that underlie Mr. K9 Warhusky's half-measures, we shall not only survive his attacks; we shall prevail.

[kd123]

I kept my silence when Mr. K9 Warhusky announced he wanted to trivialize the entire issue. I did nothing when he tried to provide conceited hypochondriacs with a milieu in which they can exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not atrabilious renegades. But his latest "compromises" are the straw that breaks the camel's back. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is. To be quite frank, I don't see how he can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that while we do nothing, those who guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. I claim that Warhusky fervently believes that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that Warhusky has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about his macabre behavior, but about the way that we can divide his cajoleries into three categories: cuckoo, empty-headed, and stroppy.

Warhusky seems to have recently added the word "transubstantiationalist" to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that there are some simple truths in this world. First, he bites the hand that feeds him. Second, it is not my goal to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet, but the opposite. And finally, in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, many people are incredulous when I tell them that he intends to put materialistic thoughts in our children's minds. "How could Warhusky be so snivelling?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is definitely possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Warhusky plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that his whinges cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to Warhusky's mawkish prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. When I first became aware of Warhusky's covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how Warhusky has been known to say that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. That notion is so damnable, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. He just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives." Warhusky wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Warhusky doing some distasteful thing every few weeks. This is not the same as saying that the underlying reasons and causes for his presumptuous vituperations must be defined, examined, and resolved, or they'll never cease, although that, too, is true. Every time Warhusky gets caught trying to till the bad-tempered side of the phallocentrism garden, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his buddies always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they contend, arrogant, diabolic underachievers aren't ever vulgar.

Warhusky's concept of team play is sideline sulking. To a lesser degree and on a smaller scale, Warhusky believes that he has answers to everything. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Warhusky and his squalid encomiasts. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that this is not the place to develop that subject. It demands many pages of analysis, which I can't spare in this letter. Instead, I'll just state the key point, which is that if I seem a bit sordid, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with him on his own level. What I mean to say is that in a tacit concession of defeat, Warhusky is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his unscrupulous cop-outs have failed at. It should be intuitively obvious even to the most casual observer that passion precludes his ability to ignore trivialities and to concentrate on the important aspects of the problem. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Warhusky. It is a statistical certainty that his hatchet men seem to suspect that Warhusky can do no wrong, just as it is a statistical certainty that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of his writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Warhusky's writings to know that you might have heard the story that Warhusky once agreed to help us show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. No one has located the document in which Warhusky said that. No one has identified when or where Warhusky said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, Warhusky thinks it would be a great idea to impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed.

Even Warhusky's adulators couldn't deal with the full impact of Warhusky's personal attacks. That's why they created "Warhusky-ism," which is just a cankered excuse to push all of us to the brink of insanity. For your information, we must enable patriots to use their freedoms to save their freedoms. Our children depend on that. Is his head really buried too deep in the sand to know that even those few who benefit from his campaigns fail to recognize their current manifestation as a sleazy form of careerism? I mean, if you looked up "perfidious" in the dictionary, you'd probably see his picture. To say merely that by provoking his opponents to irrational rage, Warhusky makes them look like vengeful perjurers is an understatement. Although it's easy to sit in the press box and criticize, he and his shock troops pay little or no attention to the negative impact that vigilantism will have on our daily lives. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but his fantasy is to force women to live by restrictive standards not applicable to men. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of recidivism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that Warhusky lives in a mental and emotional la-la land. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. Warhusky's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it.

One of Warhusky's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to conspire with evil, never the original problem. There are three fairly obvious problems with Warhusky's utterances, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to stop the Huns at the gate. First, Warhusky should know better than to inaugurate an era of brutish anti-intellectualism. Second, he fears nothing more than the truth. And third, he accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he believe I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. The acid test for his "kinder, gentler" new drug-induced ravings should be, "Do they still institutionalize commercialism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that Warhusky says he's going to promote promiscuity and obscene language sometime soon. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that we must shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within his pea-sized brain. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own incoherent off-the-cuff comments. The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of Warhusky. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I aver that if voyeurism were an Olympic sport, Warhusky would clinch the gold medal. To close, let me accentuate that if we speak up and speak out against Mr. K9 Warhusky, we shall not only survive his attacks; we shall prevail.

[lyn]

:confused: :confused: :confused:

[CyberDrac]

:confused: :confused: :confused:

I second that.

CD

[Shazz]

likewise

[Barney]

I gave up reading after the first paragragh, its like he swallowed a thesaurus.

[Bad-Co]

Originally posted by Barney
I gave up reading after the first paragragh, its like he swallowed a thesaurus.


I scrolled down to see what you lot wrote first, so therefore didn't bother reading anything :E

[bright_]

Sorry, but are you that sad to write that much about One Admin? if you don't like him, stay away from him simple as that.
There are thousands of servers for people to play on.

[lyn]

I'm not even sure he is a MPUK admin anyway

[JeRkY]

He is an MPUK admin (bf2 EA UK online, only)

And Kd123's initial complaint about Husky has previously been handled internally.
Husky is actually one of the hardest working admins on the team and on the whole has done a grand job. That isnt to say that complaints are not followed through and all admins performance is monitored.

on a seperate note......nice post ;)

[RK[CLL]]

not reading that!!

but if its the same sort of crap as in your other thread, just drop it!! its being dealt with!!