View Full Version : Frog = Tadpole?
Elbonio
30th January 2006, 10:26
Why do we call frogs, frogs?
Surely they are adult tadpoles?
gabes
30th January 2006, 10:31
You do realise there are hundreds of other species this could be applied to including our own?
:D
Elbonio
30th January 2006, 10:34
well, generally when you call a lamb a lamb, it's understood that a lamb is a baby sheep
but tadpoles seem to be classed as separate creatures I think - when really they're the same thing.
What about caterpillars and butterflies then? Surely butterflies are adult caterpillars? Why don't we say "oh look - a caterpillar" as a butterfly flies past?
WhiteKnight
30th January 2006, 10:45
So are you saying that you`re an adult baby.... or an adult child ?
Elbonio
30th January 2006, 10:51
no because we generally consider babies to be human
I'm an adult human now, I was a baby human - and I've been a teenage human.
But tadpoles, at least in my mind, are classed as separate creatures.
i.e. tadpoles are to frogs as caterpillars are to butterflies.
I think from now on I'll look at frogs and see tadpoles.
gabes
30th January 2006, 10:57
A tadpole (also known as a pollywog) is a larval frog, toad, salamander, or newt.
It seems that a tadpole is a developmental stage for more than just a frog and therefore calling a frog an adult tadpole would confuse matters.
Andy^
30th January 2006, 11:06
Originally posted by Elbonio
well, generally when you call a lamb a lamb, it's understood that a lamb is a baby sheep
MEAT!!!
-Andy :D
Gunsmith
30th January 2006, 11:34
Originally posted by Elbonio
no because we generally consider babies to be human
i consider them to be a foul **** smelling 18 year liability.
WhiteKnight
30th January 2006, 11:46
rofl...
**** smelling for 18yrs ?
Ch3m1c4L
30th January 2006, 15:08
hes obviously using his first 18 years as an example :P
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.