PDA

View Full Version : Public Server IPs (Updated: 5th Sept)


Azazel
16th June 2003, 15:42
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public CTF 1 (Face Only) (ut://212.42.10.162:27441/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public CTF 2 (ut://212.42.10.162:27670/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public DM 1 (Deck16 Only) (ut://212.42.10.162:27690/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public DM 2 (Deck16 Duel) (ut://212.42.10.162:27701/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public iCTF 1 (Relics) (ut://212.42.16.12:43905/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public iCTF 2 (Caves/Gaunt) (ut://212.42.16.12:43930/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public iDom 1 (ut://212.42.10.162:27685/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public iLMS (ut://212.42.16.12:43925/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public Rocket Arena (ut://212.42.16.12:43920/)
Multiplay.co.uk :: Public Tac Ops 1 (tacops://212.42.16.12:43900/)

At the moment these servers are mostly empty, however some are gradually starting to fill. We will not be adding any more untill the existing ones fill, so please go out there and use them. If you have any problems with the above servers please grab me or Neophyte and we'll sort it out.


Ip's updated

Gaspode
16th June 2003, 18:00
nice 1 azzy
all added to faves

Gas

^M0eZz|e^
17th June 2003, 17:05
Nice, hope the insta server is good to play at for me

Neophyte
17th June 2003, 20:19
Any feedback on the publics as they go up would be appreciated, as ever we want to provide something you all want. Feedback is very important to us, as it helps us to get everything right etc.

Limi
17th June 2003, 23:24
possibly not map vote on assault, you'd just get them playing overlord all the time, assault you need change. Just need the correct maplist so people will wait through the crap levels to play the good ones ie..

AS-OceanFloor - Crap
AS-Overlord - Good
AS-Guardia - Crap

etc

Azazel
17th June 2003, 23:39
Oceanfloor - 35 secs :)
Quality map

Limi
17th June 2003, 23:49
Originally posted by Azazel
Oceanfloor - 35 secs :)
Quality map that on your own?

Azazel
18th June 2003, 08:25
I think I'm about 40/50ish on my own .. been that long I honestly can't remember ... I do remember it was about 30/35ish for teamplay

|Lucifer|MnM|
18th June 2003, 09:10
Whats the chance of an insta domination server?

Only one I know of is the orange hosted one which is always full - but which also performs horribly.

Maybe an opening there to get more peeps onto your servers :)

Azazel
18th June 2003, 09:14
Added to list of "Coming Soon" as I've had a few queries about this

|Lucifer|MnM|
18th June 2003, 09:19
Ah excellent

/me rubs hands together :D

EuRo_KiLLeR
18th June 2003, 09:31
iDOM :D

/me likes iDOM

|Lucifer|MnM|
18th June 2003, 09:34
Hi Col - fancy seeing you ere :alien:

EuRo_KiLLeR
18th June 2003, 09:41
Hehehe yeah, I heard iDOM mentioned :D, dont play it in UT only 2k3 at the mo, but ya never know I may start to play UT again if the servers are ok, only hope my new connex is gonna be good :D

|Lucifer|MnM|
18th June 2003, 09:52
I love idom at the mo - never played it much till the recent clanbase idom cup - now I play it more than ictf.

Azazel
18th June 2003, 11:48
Originally posted by EuRo_KiLLeR
Hehehe yeah, I heard iDOM mentioned :D, dont play it in UT only 2k3 at the mo, but ya never know I may start to play UT again if the servers are ok, only hope my new connex is gonna be good :D
Servers are very similar ping/hops to Jolt so you should do :D

^M0eZz|e^
18th June 2003, 14:58
idom = kewl :o

Limi
19th June 2003, 17:56
Originally posted by EuRo_KiLLeR
only hope my new connex is gonna be good :D Tracing route to server133.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.10.133]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 27 ms 19 ms 28 ms mailbox1-hg2.ilford.broadband.bt.net [217.41.213.201]
2 29 ms 19 ms 19 ms mailbox-fer2-gig3.ilford.broadband.bt.net [217.41.213.130]
3 29 ms 29 ms 19 ms mailbox-nte-atm2.2.ilford.broadband.bt.net [217.41.213.238]
4 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms core1.lon-thm.mailbox.net.uk [195.82.97.49]
5 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms core2.lon-th1.mailbox.net.uk [195.82.96.225]
6 99 ms 28 ms 29 ms fe0-1.lonthr2.qix.co.uk [193.203.5.122]
7 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms fe4-0.lonthr4.as8838.net [212.42.1.108]
8 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms server133.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.10.133]

Trace complete owned :D traceroute to 212.42.10.133 (212.42.10.133), 64 hops max, 44 byte packets
1 fe0-1-2.lonthr1.as8838.net (212.42.1.252) 0.600 ms 0.556 ms 0.387 ms
2 server133.multiplay.co.uk (212.42.10.133) 0.622 ms 0.457 ms 0.369 ms
owned even more :D

EuRo_KiLLeR
19th June 2003, 18:03
nice pings :D

At the moment I have NTL but will have ADSL in a few weeks (hopefully)

Tracing route to server133.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.10.133]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 10 ms 16 ms 51 ms 10.152.79.254
3 17 ms 95 ms 45 ms rdng-t2cam1-a-v102.inet.ntl.com [62.253.122.9]
4 187 ms 103 ms 67 ms winn-t2core-a-ge-wan61.inet.ntl.com [62.253.121.1]
5 35 ms 19 ms 11 ms win-bb-a-so-200-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.113]
6 47 ms 13 ms 86 ms gfd-bb-b-so-500-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.130]
7 114 ms 16 ms 22 ms tele-ic-2-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.74]
8 67 ms 35 ms * linx-1.as8838.net [195.66.224.171]
9 23 ms 14 ms 117 ms fe4-0.lonthr4.as8838.net [212.42.1.108]
10 60 ms 23 ms 32 ms server133.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.10.133]

Trace complete.

As you can see not very good at the moment :( and that was the best one lol

Galandriel
20th June 2003, 01:17
Too bad noone plays at the servers yet :(
Hopefully people will discovere em soon and start playin there, we need some quality servers tbh :)

Gaspode
20th June 2003, 06:14
06/20/03 07:14:02 Fast traceroute 212.42.10.133
Trace 212.42.10.133 ...
1 192.168.0.1 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
2 10.27.176.1 10ms 13ms 12ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
3 62.30.64.161 8ms 12ms 9ms TTL: 0 (gsr01-hf.blueyonder.co.uk fraudulent rDNS)
4 172.18.6.41 19ms 15ms 14ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
5 194.117.136.2 12ms 13ms 13ms TTL: 0 (tele1-azt-pos.telewest.net fraudulent rDNS)
6 194.117.140.9 13ms 14ms 12ms TTL: 0 (e41-isp1-gw1-uk.cableinet.net fraudulent rDNS)
7 195.66.224.171 12ms 28ms 12ms TTL: 0 (linx-1.as8838.net fraudulent rDNS)
8 212.42.1.108 13ms 16ms 13ms TTL: 0 (fe4-0.lonthr4.as8838.net fraudulent rDNS)
9 212.42.10.133 15ms 13ms 15ms TTL: 56 (server133.multiplay.co.uk fraudulent rDNS)

Azazel
20th June 2003, 08:31
Wish I had my works connection at home

Ping
06/20/03 09:30:36 ping 212.42.10.133
Ping 212.42.10.133 ...
1 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
2 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
3 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 15ms, TTL: 56
4 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
5 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
6 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
7 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
8 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
9 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
10 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 0ms, TTL: 56
WTF @ Ping!!!! :D


Trace
06/20/03 09:29:43 Fast traceroute 212.42.10.133
Trace 212.42.10.133 ...
1 192.0.0.161 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
2 195.92.154.210 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
3 195.92.57.25 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (a12-0-0.253.ac-3.msl.as5388.net ok)
4 195.92.196.5 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (ge1-0.5.pbr-1.msl.as5388.net ok)
5 195.92.201.13 16ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (ge1-0.pomegranate.as5388.net ok)
6 195.66.224.126 15ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (linx1.lon1.as8553.net ok)
7 195.10.255.195 16ms 15ms 16ms TTL: 0 (fa3-1.lon3.as8553.net ok)
8 195.10.255.90 15ms 16ms 15ms TTL: 0 (as8553-gw.qix.net probable bogus rDNS: No DNS)
9 212.42.1.108 16ms 16ms 16ms TTL: 0 (fe4-0.lonthr4.as8838.net bogus rDNS: host not found [authoritative])
10 212.42.10.133 16ms 15ms 15ms TTL: 56 (server133.multiplay.co.uk bogus rDNS: host not found [authoritative])

GeeDee
18th July 2003, 11:39
Tracing route to server133.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.10.133]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 35 ms 35 ms 192 ms bonobo.lns.watford.access.planet.net.uk [195.92.
66.184]
2 41 ms 35 ms 34 ms ge7-0.3.lettuce.as5388.net [195.92.66.2]
3 37 ms 38 ms 35 ms linx2.lon3.as8553.net [195.66.226.126]
4 40 ms 38 ms 38 ms as8553-gw.qix.net [195.10.255.90]
5 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms fe4-0.lonthr4.as8838.net [212.42.1.108]
6 43 ms 42 ms 43 ms server133.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.10.133]

Trace complete.

I think thats more than acceptable. :)

Shame im only on an ISDN connection though. :/

Giles.

Azazel
18th July 2003, 11:51
Have you tried freeserve as your ISP, in game pings of between 50-70 usually

Cheez
18th July 2003, 11:59
I think Freeserve IS his ISP. :)

Pinging 212.42.10.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=54
Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=54
Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=54
Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=54 From work, and PING 212.42.10.133 (212.42.10.133): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=16.285 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=17.750 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=18.834 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=17.484 ms

--- 212.42.10.133 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 16.285/17.588/18.834/0.907 ms from home. :)

I've blocked ICMP at home and the firewall blocks it at work so I can't do trace-routes.

Azazel
18th July 2003, 12:07
Wish I had my works connection :(
07/18/03 13:05:57 ping 212.42.10.133
Ping 212.42.10.133 ...
1 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
2 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
3 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 15ms, TTL: 56
4 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
5 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
6 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 15ms, TTL: 56
7 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
8 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 15ms, TTL: 56
9 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
10 Addr:212.42.10.133, RTT: 16ms, TTL: 56
07/18/03 13:06:42 Fast traceroute 212.42.10.133
Trace 212.42.10.133 ...
1 192.0.0.161 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
2 195.92.154.210 0ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (No rDNS)
3 195.92.57.25 0ms 15ms 0ms TTL: 0 (a12-0-0.253.ac-3.msl.as5388.net ok)
4 195.92.196.5 15ms 0ms 0ms TTL: 0 (ge1-0.5.pbr-1.msl.as5388.net ok)
5 195.92.201.13 16ms 16ms 16ms TTL: 0 (ge1-0.pomegranate.as5388.net ok)
6 195.66.224.126 0ms 16ms 0ms TTL: 0 (linx1.lon1.as8553.net ok)
7 195.10.255.195 16ms 0ms 16ms TTL: 0 (fa3-1.lon3.as8553.net ok)
8 195.10.255.90 15ms 16ms 0ms TTL: 0 (as8553-gw.qix.net probable bogus rDNS: No DNS)
9 212.42.1.108 16ms 0ms 16ms TTL: 0 (fe4-0.lonthr4.as8838.net bogus rDNS: host not found [authoritative])
10 212.42.10.133 15ms 15ms 0ms TTL: 56 (server133.multiplay.co.uk bogus rDNS: host not found [authoritative])

K
21st July 2003, 16:14
Lol works connection home connection:
PING 212.42.10.133 (212.42.10.133): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=9.521 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=10.746 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=10.877 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=10.347 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=10.649 ms
64 bytes from 212.42.10.133: icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=10.657 ms
^C
--- 212.42.10.133 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 9.521/10.466/10.877/0.452 ms

HeMp
22nd July 2003, 20:01
Originally posted by Azazel
List of Publics for your Playing Enjoyment :).......

DM Deck16 Only
IP: 212.42.10.162:27690
Maps: Deck16
Mutators: None

DM 1
IP: Coming Soon ...
Maps: Mixed
Mutators: Map Vote



can you please remove the redeemer from the dm servers?

i know its fun ending someones godlike with a sneaky redeemer in the arse, but it gets rather boring after 5 minutes. It took jolt about 2 years to work that out..... ;/

o and with bt broadband:

Originally posted by MS-DOS
Pinging 212.42.10.133 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 212.42.10.133: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 212.42.10.133:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 18ms


:confused:

Azazel
22nd July 2003, 22:47
Thought I had mate, sorting it now

HeMp
22nd July 2003, 23:20
Nice 1 :p:

Cr0w
2nd August 2003, 19:20
Someone tell me why the deck16 only server, and the ctf2 server, has the same IP and port?

Cheez
2nd August 2003, 19:31
It's one of those new mind reading servers, you connect, and it reads your mind as to what game you want to play.

Either that or it's got something to do with the fact that the port numbers are different.

Azazel
18th August 2003, 09:50
Erm sorted now :D
/me whistles and wanders off casually ....

Neophyte
18th August 2003, 13:15
Added 2 Tac Ops servers last night, redirects need sorting out but aside from that, enjoy :)

K
18th August 2003, 13:23
Better place to look for ips is:
UT: http://gaming.multiplay.co.uk/serverlist.php?sectionid=252
UT2k3: http://gaming.multiplay.co.uk/serverlist.php?sectionid=253

Azazel
18th August 2003, 15:04
iDOM server added (go Neo :D )

sktz
20th August 2003, 12:47
just a wonder0rz ummm u got ictf without relics i cba to read those to pages except teh first page ne others i should no about?

Neophyte
20th August 2003, 14:30
next ictf will be more run of the mill m8 :) besides, only a few relics are on

AkiRaM
31st August 2003, 14:07
Have tried your Relic server and had great fun :D

Hope you has a server that has Curse][ on it coz dats my fav ;)

Azazel
5th September 2003, 13:45
/me prods whoever unstuck this thread to leave it alone :/

BullDog
5th September 2003, 14:20
same mofo that killed teh demos azzy?

Azazel
5th September 2003, 14:41
Nah different ppl

BullDog
5th September 2003, 14:56
O.o
/me wonders if azzy is the only who knows what he is doing there :p:

Neophyte
5th September 2003, 22:39
rofl :D